May 10, 2007 Weekly Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter
The real
estate news for the past three months has been focused on sub-prime lenders. The
million dollar question is how big will the impact be locally. Unfortunately,
the impact will be larger than some think as a first time buyer who cannot
purchase prevents a trade up person from selling and purchasing the next home.
The impact can be seen in many ways including:
1) The more affordable areas have had significantly increases
in DUI.
DUI in East Valley increased from 109 to 311.
2) The number of sales decreased from 36.5 sales/day to 33.0
sales/day at a time when they are
normally climbing.
3) The number of completed sales didn't jump as much as the
initiated sales did indicating a larger number of escrows did not close.
Calculated TFT rates jumped to 10%.
4) The median Sold price climbed rapidly yet market area
prices climbed slower indicating a shift in the market mix with the high-end
becoming a larger portion.
5) The median square footage for the completed sales is near
a record high and has climbed from 1,620 SF on March 1st to 1,707 on March 22nd
and 1,760 on May 3rd.
6) There is a very large discrepancy between the median price
of those properties that successfully closed and those that were suppose to
close but did not.
7) The affordable areas made up 16.4% of the closings in
February and only 11.8% of the closings in March.
8) The Mt. View, Los Altos and Palo Alto areas typically are
about 10% of SCC's transactions went from 9% to 25% of SCC transactions.
This first set of graphs shows how the current market components (inventory, sales, DUI) are doing compared to their historical norms. Each graph has a red line ('red-hot' market), a green line (normal market), a light blue line ('ice-cold' market), and a deep blue line (current data). (Note: These graphs still need minor adjustments as the growth factor of the past 8 years is calculated for today's market and needs to be reduced for previous years and the DUI graph to reflect our original definition of 45-90 days of unsold inventory was a balanced market.)
Inventory was essentially normal from November 2005 through May 2006. June 2006 through September 2006 inventory increased more rapidly than normal, moving above normal levels. Since October 2006, inventory is following the normal trend, albeit with more inventory than normal. Some thought that the reduction in inventory was an indication the market was improving. Unfortunately as this graph shows, the reduction was normal for the end of the year as is the current increase in inventory.
Sales VOLUME was essentially normal from December 2004 through October 2005 with some extra sales in April through June 2006. The sales volume normally drops dramatically at year's end making it difficult to sense any shifts. This seasonal drop in sales helps explain why many did not perceive the reduction in sales volume as it occurred from mid-October 2005 through mid-December 2005. As March 2006 arrived, the seasonal increase in sales volume made the reduced sales volume more apparent. Sales volume has been significantly lower than normal, essentially tracing the cool market trend line from mid-December 2006 through May 2007.Notice the significant departure from low sales to even lower sales since March 27, 2007. This could be a direct result of the sub-prime lender issues and those buyers no longer making offers.
Days of Unsold Inventory is the most important market component because it measures the supply/demand balance. This graph is very telling. DUI frequently moves rapidly from a cool market into a hot market or visa-versa. The market remained hot through September 2005. Starting mid-October 2005 the market shifted from a hot to cooler than normal. During March and April 2006 the market improved to normal before slowing rapidly in May and June 2006. By July 4, 2006 DUI was following the normal pattern right on top of the cool market indicator and continues to do so with only minor fluctuations. DUI is currently increasing slightly more rapidly than normal, which is not good news.
90-day market indicator: declined steeply from October 2005 through January 2006. During this period our indicator went from a 'good market' to a 'poor market'. Our indicator has been bouncing around the divider between a 'fair market' and 'poor market' since February 2006. There was a slight improvement early in January 2007 followed by a noticeable decline in April 2007. Since July 1993, our indicator has only been this low for approximately 3 months, April March and October 2001. With the degree of accuracy this model has had since 1992 we suspect that the current increase in the market will be short lived.
HISTORICAL COMPARISONS: The table below compares the current real estate market conditions to each of the previous 7 years. This seasonally adjusts the data by comparing the current year to the same period of the historical year. 100% would mean that the current year is the same as the year indicated. The sign ( + = - ) next to each year indicates whether the current market trends are improving(+), staying the same(=), or getting worse(-) compared to that specific year. Better/worse is determined from the owner's/seller's point of view.
| current market conditions | inventory | sales volume | dui |
| stronger than | 01= | 01- | 01- |
| same as | 03- | ||
| weaker than | 00+ 02= 04= 05= 06= | 00- 02+ 03- 04- 05= 06= | 00= 02+ 03- 04= 05= 06= |
The market is clearly weaker than most previous years.
inventory: Inventory is 132% to 220% of previous years except 2001 at 80% and 2003 at 96%. Inventory is currently following the normal seasonal pattern. A negative sign in the table represents increasing inventory as that is would be bad news.
sales volume: Sales volume that had been declining stabilized in mid-September followed by some improvement during October through mid-January has started to decline again through April 19th. the past week has seen sales increasing again. The million dollar question is 'Why are buyers not buying. Currently, sales volume is only 56% to 86% of past years with the exception being 2001 at 117%.
DAYS of UNSOLD INVENTORY: DUI is higher (worse) 153% to 283% compared to most years and 125% off 2003. The current DUI is lower (better) than 2001 @ 69%. DUI is an objective measure of the supply demand balance that fundamentally drives pricing in a capitalist economy. Unlike inventory and sales, which should be (but are not) adjusted for growth, DUI is self adjusting for any growth because it is a ratio as opposed to an absolute number.
CONCLUSION: Seasonally adjusted data is more significant than the raw (unadjusted) data that follows. The seasonally adjusted indicators don't speak well of the near-term future of the SCC real estate market despite the current increase in median pricing. The continuing reduction in sales volume remains our biggest concern. Because DUI has increased and is now above 90, we expect some short-term appreciation should stop in about 2-months. SCC is likely to see flat year over year appreciation for most of 2007. The strength in the northwest quadrant as indicated by a DUI of only 30, would support additional appreciation in that area. The shift in the market mix will cause the median pricing to increase artificially.
We believe that the peak for 2005 market occurred at around Mother's Day 2005. May and June 2005, were the hottest market since we started our detailed analysis in 1998. July 2005 through December 2005, the market cooled significantly more than normal. December 2005 through February 2007, has been one of the weakest markets since 1998 with only 2001 being weaker. There were fewer initiated sales (offers accepted) in July and November 2006 than in any year since 1998. January 2007 was the second worst year since September 1998. February through April 2007 initiated sales only surpassed their respective 2001 levels.
It is noteworthy to mention that SCC's real estate market appears to be divided geographically. The northwest portion of the County (north of 280 and west of 880) is still strong and experiencing a Seller's market. Most of the County is experiencing balanced market conditions. The most affordable areas and South County are in a buyers' market. The appreciation in the northwest quadrant of SCC will likely be the greatest. The rest of SCC will likely have lower or even negative appreciation. A geographically divide within SCC is unusual.
Clients must make their own decision on when to buy and sell real estate. We believe real estate will continue to be a good long term investment. We believe sellers should place their homes on the market sooner as opposed to later, especially if sales continue to be weak. With the sub-prime loan issues disproportionately negatively impacting the low-end of the market, we expect that the median Sold price will actually set new record highs because of the shift in market mix. It is likely that homes in the northwest section of SCC will be at record high levels while the rest of SCC is near but below their 2006 levels.
Buyers need to balance their personal needs with the risk of increasing interest rates coupled with a softening market. Basically, we believe that a buyer should not feel any pressure from higher prices except in the north west section of SCC, but should at least consider the risk interest rates may increase provided they are looking at a long-term fixed interest rate. Cash and adjustable rate loan buyers should consider waiting for the prices to dip.
This weekly analysis is based on the overall real estate market conditions of single family homes in Santa Clara County. Additional background information If you are considering selling or buying, it is important to evaluate specific real estate market data for your individual transaction based on price range, geographic area, and type of real estate you are purchasing or selling. Just contact us for this customized information.
RAW DATA for Santa Clara County. Raw data for the other counties follow the analysis of Santa Clara County data.
| SANTA CLARA | 3/8/2007 | 4/12/2007 | 4/19/2007 | 4/26/2007 | 5/3/2007 | 5/10/2007 | trend favors |
| inventory | 2431 | 3015 | 3160 | 3227 | 3332 | 3452 | Buyer |
| DUI 500K-1.0M | 67.1 | 93.4 | 98.5 | 96.4 | 102.1 | 105.2 | Buyer |
| DUI $1.0+M | 84.3 | 80.6 | 89.4 | 85.8 | 83.9 | 83.6 | Neutral |
| DUI overall | 71.8 | 89.1 | 95.6 | 93.0 | 96.0 | 98.0 | Buyer |
| LP med | $795,000 | $840,000 | $838,500 | $839,900 | $839,000 | $846,500 | Seller |
| #sales | 33.9 | 33.8 | 33.3 | 34.7 | 34.7 | 35.2 | Neutral |
| %normal sales | 83.1% | 76.8% | 75.8% | 79.2% | 78.0% | 77.4% | Buyer |
| Completed Sales | 3/8/2007 | 4/12/2007 | 4/19/2007 | 4/26/2007 | 5/3/2007 | 5/10/2007 | . |
| SP 10% | $620,000 | $639,000 | $645,000 | $645,900 | $645,000 | $650,000 | Seller |
| SP 50% med | $791,500 | $847,000 | $843,000 | $855,000 | $870,000 | $868,703 | Seller |
| 90% sold price | $1,561,200 | $1,785,000 | $1,705,080 | $1,748,500 | $1,822,000 | $1,804,500 | Seller |
| ave sp/lp ratio | 100.0% | 100.6% | 100.7% | 100.7% | 100.8% | 100.8% | Seller |
| % sp>lp | 38.3% | 42.2% | 43.6% | 45.2% | 52.3% | 45.4% | Neutral |
| median DOM | 37 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 15 | Seller |
| ave DOM | 70.0 | 52.6 | 52.7 | 48.8 | 46.7 | 45.6 | Seller |
| # closings | 720 | 841 | 857 | 884 | 847 | 848 | Neutral |
| . | 1662//3.46//2.19 | 1736//3.50//2.20 | 1717//3.51//2.21 | 1741//3.52//2.23 | 1760//3.57//2.28 | 1741//3.57//2.27 | . |
Inventory: - 3,452; Inventory started increasing on January 3, 2007. This would tend to support our belief that 2007 will be a soft year. Historically the earlier in the year inventory starts to increase, the softer that year is.
Sales initiated per day: (demand) 35.2 This is the average daily number of initiated sales (offers accepted). Sales normal start increasing around January 17th. 2007 sales bottomed out at 19.7 on January 17th but remained there through January 23rd before increasing slower than normal. Sales have actually decreased for 3-weeeks and although currently increasing still below the peak 2007 level of 36.5 sales/day on March 27, 2007. Normally sales increase from mid-January through Memorial Day.
Percentage of normal sales initiated: – 77.4%. Sales had been fluctuating at 88% +/- 4% for the second half of 2006 before spiking to 95% in January 2007. As February 2007 arrived initiated sales dropped quickly to 78% but soon returned to the low 80's for the most of February and March. April saw the return of the high 70's. We would expect a value of about 107% as we do not make any adjustment for growth. Because we collect data for a 5-week period, it is likely that this 2007 spike was caused by the timing of the holidays opposed to any rapid changes in the market.
Days of Unsold Inventory: – 98.0 The balance between supply and demand is the most important factor in a capitalist economy. We measure this balance using Days of Unsold Inventory (DUI), while most areas use months of unsold inventory. The market has moved back to a buyers market which would likely cause prices to weaken and then decrease. This will not be the case for the northwest quadrant of SCC where there are still only 30 DUI. There is about a 2-3 month lag between shifts in DUI and median Sold price.
GEOGRAPHIC SUB-MARKETS: Note: As a result of another change to the MLS in January 2007 we will report only regional data opposed to individual real estate areas. Cupertino/Sunnyvale and Mt View/Los Altos/Palo Alto regions are leading the way in Santa Clara County with only 29 DUI. A very strong Seller's market. Slipping into a balanced market is the Santa Clara/Willow Glen/Campbell/Cambrian region with 57 DUI. Los Gatos/Saratoga region has 80 DUI Santa Teresa/North Valley/Milpitas/Blossom Valley region has bumped into a buyers market with 104 DUI. South County and East Valley/Central San Jose/ South San Jose at 254 and 259 DUI respectively are clearly buyer's market. This geographic based differences is unusual. Normally Los Gatos/Saratoga region is the slowest. Clearly that is not the current situation, we believe in large part because of the super heated conditions in the Los Altos/Palo Alto region. We believe that the more affordable areas are being disproportionately negatively impacted by the current sub-prime loan issues.
PRICE SUB-MARKETS: It is also important to note that the different price ranges have significantly different DUI and therefore different market conditions. Currently, the hottest price range is $750,000 to $2,500,000 with a DUI of 74. Price ranges should be considered the low, middle and high price ranges in any given real estate market area opposed to the set price ranges. The low priced homes (those under $600,000) have 180 DUI. Homes between $600,000 and $750,000 have 121 DUI. Then the sweet spot at only 75 DUI for $750,000 to $1.0M range. Homes between $1.0 M and $2.5 M have 72 DUI. Homes between $2.5M and 5.0 M have 6 months of unsold inventory. Finally, homes over $5 Million have 4 years. We initially considered 45 to 90 DUI a balanced market with normal appreciation. DUI graph above makes it clear that DUI is seasonal and changes throughout the year. This permits SCC to have a slower than normal year (higher DUI), especially in low and high ends while still experience appreciation in the middle.
Median List Price: $846,500. This is a new record high. We believe that this is caused by the shift in the mix of what is selling combined with the appreciation that is occurring in the northwest quadrant.
Median Sold price: – $868,703 is just below the all time record high of $870,000 set on May 3, 2007. The record high in 2006 was $830,000 on June 29, 2006. We believe that the new record is a direct result of the market mix change caused by the sub-prime loan issue combined with a strong market in the more expensive northwest quadrant of SCC. This rapid increase will likely postpone any negative annual appreciation until Fall 2007 if at all. It is likely that the historical market mix will not return until the sub-prime loan situation improves significantly. Although SMC had negative year over year appreciation for several months in 2006, SMC is currently setting new all time record highs.
Average Sold price to List price ratio: – 100.8% This measures the buyers willingness to make their offers attractive to the seller. Since July 4th this had slowly dropped to the valley of 99.0% in December 2006 before increasing in mid-February 2007 as the first 2007 sales started to close. It is noteworthy that the magnitude of overbidding dropped below 100% for the first time since March 5, 2003 reaching 99.9% on February 9, 2006 and again on September 9, 2006. We consider 98.5% a normal real estate market. This is based on the asking price at the time the offer is accepted NOT the Seller's original asking price. It reflects market conditions 25 to 95 days ago because of the length of escrow and how this data is collected. This is one of the few times where an average is more useful than the median. The median ratio would almost always be 100%. The usefulness of this statistic may be in jeopardy as a new business model has properties listed at $1,000 regardless of their value. Just one of these properties slipping through causes a 70% jump in the value. Although simple to find it is a time consuming process. Where the real issue will be is if listings listed for something like 80% of their market value.
Percentage of completed Sales where Sold price was greater than List price: – (frequency of overbidding) 45.4% - Nearly every other seller is getting more than the asking price. There is no question that the frequency of overbidding has dropped significantly from the all time record high of 75.2% that was set May 12, 2005, beating the previous record of 74.8% reached in April 2000. Overbidding gradually decreased to 34.2% on October 12th and fluctuated around 32% until the 2007 sales started to close in mid-February. Even during the worst market conditions, the frequency of overbidding stays in the teens. This figure tends to reflect market conditions 45+ days earlier because of the length of escrows and the way the data is gathered. This is comparing the Sold price to List price at the time the offer was excepted. Many sellers are now making price reductions prior to offers being accepted. The Sold price can be lower than the original List price and still count as an overbid.
Median DOM for completed sales: – 15 days. The current drop in DOM is caused by the seasonal influx of new listings. DOM is finally becoming more meaningful because the MLS is no longer allowing DOM to revert to zero if the listing agent re-lists the same property. This is a return to the rules that existed prior to July 2003. Although average DOM is more commonly used, we believe median DOM is much more reflective of the market.
How are other Counties doing?: (Based on the moving monthly data published weekly) SMC median List price is at $949,000 is essentially tied for the fourth week with the all time high of $949,744 set on April 19, 2007. SMC median Sold price is $978,000 is essentially tied with the all time record high of $980,000 set on May 3, 2007. The 2006 high was set back on June 29, 2006 at $950,000. At $846,500, SCC median List price is setting a new recent record high on May 10, 2007. The median Sold price at $868,703 is essentially tied with the record high of $870,000 set on May 3, 2007. SZC's median List price at $779,000 is off $10,500 from their record high of $789,500 set nearly 2-years ago on July 14, 2005. SZC's median Sold price of $774,375 is off $37,500 their new record of $812,000 set on December 8, 2005. MTY median List price at $698,500 is off $26,500 from their recently set record high of $725,000 set on April 5, 2007. Monterey's median Sold price of $760,000 is $10,000 below their all time record high of $771,020 set on May 3, 2007. A $100,000 jump in median price in just 7-days when using 30-days of data, which means that only 25% of the data is new, is the kind of statistical fluctuations that occur as the sample size drops below 200. Although accurate, we don't believe that this reflects appreciation just a larger number of high priced homes closed during the period.
It appears that the downward trend in real estate is moving toward the SMC/SCC border opposed to propagating out from this border. Areas close to this border are still doing well and setting record high prices.
| SAN MATEO | 3/8/2007 | 4/12/2007 | 4/19/2007 | 4/26/2007 | 5/3/2007 | 5/10/2007 | trend favors |
| inventory | 849 | 976 | 1066 | 1100 | 1118 | 1166 | Buyer |
| DUI 500K-1.0M | 57.0 | 67.9 | 79.6 | 83.8 | 83.8 | 85.8 | Buyer |
| DUI $1.0+M | 65.1 | 63.8 | 64.8 | 70.2 | 68.4 | 74.1 | Buyer |
| DUI overall | 60.0 | 66.2 | 73.2 | 77.9 | 77.2 | 80.8 | Buyer |
| DOM med | 20 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 18 | Buyer |
| LP med | $899,000 | $932,250 | $949,744 | $949,000 | $949,000 | $949,000 | Neutral |
| #sales | 14.1 | 14.7 | 14.6 | 14.1 | 14.5 | 14.4 | Neutral |
| Completed Sales | 3/8/2007 | 4/12/2007 | 4/19/2007 | 4/26/2007 | 5/3/2007 | 5/10/2007 | . |
| SP 10% | $654,250 | $676,800 | $685,000 | $683,000 | $680,000 | $680,000 | Neutral |
| SP 50% med | $866,250 | $920,000 | $957,500 | $975,000 | $980,000 | $978,000 | Seller |
| 90% sold price | $1,790,500 | $1,999,600 | $2,005,000 | $2,200,000 | $2,059,000 | $2,100,000 | Seller |
| ave sp/lp ratio | 100.7% | 101.5% | 101.3% | 101.2% | 101.4% | 101.4% | Neutral |
| % sp>lp | 42.8% | 50.7% | 47.9% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 46.5% | Neutral |
| median DOM | 37 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 16 | Neutral |
| ave DOM | 65.8 | 48.5 | 47.4 | 46.9 | 45.5 | 45.6 | Seller |
| # closings | 276 | 367 | 380 | 387 | 363 | 381 | Neutral |
| . | 1590//3.21//2.05 | 1660//3.19//2.04 | 1660//3.22//2.07 | 1731//3.26//2.08 | 1690//3.27//2.09 | 1690//3.29//2.11 | . |
| SANTA CRUZ | 3/8/2007 | 4/12/2007 | 4/19/2007 | 4/26/2007 | 5/3/2007 | 5/10/2007 |